Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Nine Terribly Disturbing Things About Electronic Cigarettes, and Why They're False

We’ve been talking a little about a less-than-educated article that we read on the Huffington Post dating back to 2013. Our plan was to write a blog refuting the points made by this blog, but instead, one of our customers took the points to test for us. We thought we’d share what he had to say, and offer a couple of other points ourselves.

The original article we’re ranting about can be found here.

1.
Them - E-cigarettes contain toxic chemicals.

Our Customer - Like formaldehyde, arsenic and cyanide? Nope, that's cigarettes.

Us – You know what else contains toxic chemicals, of which you inhale plenty of daily? For starters, household chemicals and emissions from motor vehicles. As the article here shows, the chemicals in e-liquid is negligible.

2.
Them - Kids and teens can buy them.

Our Customer - I was sold cigarettes from the age of 13 on...and every e-cig shop I've visited has observed the law(s), without exception.

Us – No one under the age of 18 is allowed in our store unless they’re with their parents.

3.
Them - While cigarette companies say they don't market to kids, e-cigarettes come in flavors like cherry, strawberry, vanilla and cookies and cream milkshake.

Our Customer - Winston used the Flintstones cartoon to advertise cigarettes, Kool had a cartoon penguin logo for years, and Camel sells Exotic Blends with flavors like Mandarin Mint (orange/mint), Dark Mint (chocolate mint) and Crema (vanilla). Did I mention Joe Camel?

Us – We’re tired of this flavor argument. No adult just magically loses interest in flavor because they’re older.

4.
Them - Laws regulating cigarette ads don't yet apply to e-cigarettes.

Our Customer-Yet the only television ads I've ever seen for e-cigs is for Blu, which is owned by the company that owns Pall Mall, Camel and Newport cigarettes.

Us – They shouldn’t. Our product is not tobacco. Our product is anti-tobacco.

5.
Them - And e-cigarette companies are spending a TON on advertising.

Our Customer - They are NOT getting their money's worth...I've seen the Blu ad maybe 10 times ever.

Us – Most manufacturers of e-cigarette hardware have no need to advertise, and the manufacturers of most e-liquids are mom and pop type businesses who sank all of their funds into creating sanitary spaces for liquid creation that meet tough industry standards. The people spending “tons of money” on advertising are the individual stores, and as you’d guess, the budget of your mom and pop vape shop is not billions of dollars.

6.
Them - E-cigarettes can be used in many places where smoking is banned.

Our Customer - Not so much. Unfortunately the average person cannot or will not distinguish water vapor from smoke. There is a difference.

Us – In the places vaping is allowed indoors it’s helping to promote a reduction in tobacco consumption.

7.
Them - People think e-cigarettes can help them quit smoking.

Our Customer - I smoked a pack a day from 1985 through 2013, and have smoked two packs total since starting e-cigs. The patch didn't work, nicotine gum didn't work...E-CIGS WORK.

Us – Quitters Wall. ‘Nuff said.



8.
Them - E-cigarettes aren't taxed like traditional tobacco products.

Our Customer - They aren't tobacco products, they're nicotine products. Minor detail, but there is a difference.

Us – Our customer said it best.

9.
Them - Despite unknown health consequences, e-cigarettes are poised to make inroads with a new generation of young people.

Our Customer - I have noticed a significant improvement in the quality of my life since the e-cig...I can breathe much deeper, run a lot further and I sweat far less, not to mention that my clothes/car/home no longer smell like an ashtray. Oh, it costs less than a dollar a day to vape, cigarettes are around $7 a pack.

Us – We hope that this changes the way an entire generation looks at tobacco and nicotine consumption. In an ideal world, no one would use nicotine, but until then, we’re going to shoot for the next best thing – No tobacco.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Big Tobacco gets it, and that’s why they want to stop it!

A week ago we read an article discussing a 119-page document, created by RJ Reynolds, that was submitted to the FDA in the US calling for a ban on all open vapor products.

What is an “open vapor product” you might ask? Good question! An open vapor product is any vaping product that requires a refill or application of e-liquid to function. This includes all mods, tanks, refillable cartridges, and ultimately, bottles of e-liquid.

The article, which you can read here, gives a perspective that we can all understand. They say that RJ Reynolds does not want these open vapor products on the market because they make replacing tobacco far easier.

We can agree with that because we've been there. We've tried the closed vapor products, better known as disposable e-cigarettes, and these systems are in no way shape or form a replacement for tobacco. The frustration a consumer experiences from using cheaply manufactured devices, low-quality liquid, and a rather hefty price tag can make vaping incredibly unappealing.

That’s what RJ Reynolds is really after. If they’re able to get open vapor products banned from the market they not only corner the offerings, they drive consumerism back to their literal cash crop.

We can’t imagine the FDA will take a tobacco company’s opinion seriously in the anti-tobacco fight, but money buys a lot of things. Support of the government is one piece of the puzzle for purchase, but so is industry to some extent.

This presentation of a 119-page document to the FDA should signal to everyone in our industry that, while Big Tobacco may be supporting vaping efforts to some extent, they’re hedging their bets on both sides of the fence.

Drop Big Tobacco, folks, and when you find some of your favorite products support RJ Reynolds and/or other Big Tobacco lobbyist groups, drop them too. That’s what we did. Ask Johnson Creek.